• Every major organization that has endorsed in the 26th Middlesex has endorsed Rep. Mike Connolly

    Every major organization that has endorsed in the 26th Middlesex has endorsed Rep. Mike Connolly

    Every major organization that has endorsed in the 26th Middlesex has endorsed Rep. Mike Connolly.

    Whether a voter’s top concern is housing affordability, reproductive health care, LGBTQ+ rights, climate change, workers’ rights, public education, or transportation, the people fighting for these issues are united behind State Representative Mike Connolly in his campaign for re-election in the 26th Middlesex.

    Rep. Mike Connolly has earned the trust and support of every major organization endorsing in the race, both locally and across the state. The coalition backing Connolly includes over 30 organizations, representing thousands of organizers and activists fighting on the front lines and working on the most pressing issues facing our state.

    Here’s what the state’s leading progressive advocacy organization has to say about Mike:

    “Mike Connolly has been a progressive champion since we first endorsed him in 2016,” said Jonathan Cohn, Policy Director at Progressive Massachusetts. “Mike is the rare state representative who gets an ‘A’ every year on our Progressive Scorecard. Mike has fought for stronger tenant protections, social housing, and revenue for affordable housing, as well as workers’ rights, bold climate action, voting rights, transparency, and more. Mike is willing to speak out against bad, rushed legislation and to push the State House to be more ambitious in all of its policymaking.”

    Advocates working to address the housing emergency are also with Mike.

    “Representative Connolly has consistently championed reforms that expand housing production while strengthening tenant protections. He has actively sponsored and co-sponsored pro-housing legislation and used his position in the State House to help turn those policies into law — from legalizing ADUs by right statewide and unlocking more housing production around transit, to pioneering the concept of mixed-income social housing in Massachusetts. The cities of Cambridge and Somerville have a real housing champion in Mike Connolly,” said Jesse Kanson-Benanav, Executive Director of Abundant Housing MA.

    As Trump continues to wage war on reproductive freedom, organizers at the center of the fight to protect abortion rights are with Mike.

    “For years, Mike has been a true partner to Planned Parenthood at the State House, championing health care access for all and fiercely advocating for reproductive rights legislation including bills to remove abortion restrictions in Massachusetts,” said Dominique Lee, President of the Planned Parenthood Advocacy Fund of Massachusetts. “In the year and a half since Trump took office, attempts to curtail Planned Parenthood’s services and threaten reproductive health providers have skyrocketed, but at every turn, we’ve had leaders like Representative Connolly taking action to invest in reproductive health care and ensure Massachusetts leads the way for reproductive freedom. The Planned Parenthood Advocacy Fund is proud to endorse Mike Connolly for re-election.”

    Environmental groups across the state have also backed Connolly as the climate candidate for Cambridge and Somerville.

    “Mike Connolly has been a champion for energy efficiency, renewable power, expanding clean air and water regulations, and community engagement,” said Casey Bowers, Executive Director of the Environmental League of Massachusetts Action Fund. “He has demonstrated true leadership for the 26th Middlesex District, including for environmental justice communities like East Somerville, the Port, and Cambridgeport. The ELM Action Fund is thrilled to endorse his candidacy.”

    “Mike will continue to fight for climate justice and energy affordability, and he knows we can’t pit the two against each other,” said Vick Mohanka, Chapter Director of the Sierra Club Massachusetts. “Our chapter is proud to endorse Mike for reelection in his fight to hold investor-owned corporate utilities and the fossil fuel industry accountable.”

    The message from Massachusetts progressives is resoundingly clear: they want Mike Connolly to continue the fight alongside them in the State House.

    “I am honored that so many labor unions, progressive organizations, and local groups have recognized my accomplishments in the legislature and my commitment to justice in all its forms,” said Rep. Mike Connolly. “From teachers and housing advocates to nurses and climate activists, these are the organizers who know what it takes to deliver on our values on Beacon Hill. These organizations do not offer their support lightly. In some cases, I am the only incumbent, or one of just a few, to receive their endorsement. I am grateful and proud to have earned their support through years of standing together, fighting for our shared values, and delivering results.”

    Rep. Connolly has also been endorsed by Reproductive Equity Now, MassEquality, Massachusetts AFL-CIO, Massachusetts Teachers Association, Massachusetts Nurses Association, National Association of Social Workers (Mass. PACE), Service Employees International Union State Council, UNITE HERE Local 26, Transportation Division of the International Association of Sheet Metal, Air, Rail and Transportation Workers, Massachusetts Organization of State Engineers and Scientists, Massachusetts Voters for Animals, Our Revolution Cambridge, Cambridge Bike Safety, Somerville YIMBY, Somerville for Palestine, and dozens of other groups and elected officials. For a full list of endorsements, please visit www.mikeconnolly.org/endorsements

  • A Specific Example of the Differences on Housing Policy in This Race

    A Specific Example of the Differences on Housing Policy in This Race

    Dear Cambridge and Somerville Constituents —

    Last week I reached out to ask for your help in my re-election campaign — and so many of you responded with pledges to vote, sign requests, donations, and commitments to volunteer—thank you!

    If you still want to get involved, you can visit my volunteer page to sign up to contact voters or request a sign, and you can make a contribution here.

    On Thursday, I participated in a forum with my opponent, Neil Miller, and he continued to present a distorted case for why he would be a better leader on the issue of housing.

    He once again criticized a vote I cast in 2023, and I want to take a moment to talk about it, because I think it's actually a good example of the kind of leadership I provide on housing, and some of the differences in this race.

    My vote was in opposition to a major expansion of the state's Housing Development Incentive Program, also known as HDIP.

    Housing development incentives sound good, right?

    The problem with HDIP, as I explained in my speech on the House floor, is that every year it gives tens of millions of dollars to for-profit, market-rate housing developers, but it has no affordability requirements whatsoever.

    Moreover, the program offers no direct benefit to Cambridge or Somerville, because the funding only goes to designated Gateway Cities. And even the term "gateway city" can be problematic, because the needs of Salem and Quincy are different from those of Pittsfield or Chelsea.

    Many noted leaders in Gateway Cities, such as Chelsea's Gladys Vega, have called for affordability reforms to HDIP. So have the leaders of Progressive Massachusetts and the Massachusetts Association of Community Development Corporations.

    A report from the Massachusetts Law Reform Institute (MLRI) documented some of the results of the HDIP program: a state-subsidized studio in Malden renting for $3,438/mo.; a one-bedroom in Lowell renting for $3,467/mo.; and literally the first-ever million-dollar condo sold in Salem.

    According to the latest data compiled by MLRI, the state has provided some $146 million in HDIP credits to 88 residential developments, and the results have been stark: 97% of the units are market-rate or above; just 3% of the units are affordable.

    To be sure, we all understand it is very difficult to build housing right now. And I support doing everything possible to do so. But as I explained at this week's forum, even when it comes to getting market-rate housing off the ground, there are much better ways to make it happen.

    One example of a better way is a program I helped advance in the Affordable Homes Act called the Momentum Fund. The Momentum Fund is a revolving investment fund, administered by MassHousing, that helps market-rate projects get off the ground in this very difficult fiscal environment. The Momentum Fund requires that at least 20% of the new units be set aside as affordable.

    And best of all, the fund is designed to revolve, so the Commonwealth's investment can be returned and reinvested in additional housing over time — unlike HDIP, which basically hands no-strings-attached state dollars to high-end housing developers. The Momentum Fund is one of the ideas that emerged, in part, out of my advocacy on Beacon Hill to advance the concept of social housing.

    Even when I voted No on HDIP, I said that I would be willing to come to the table and work with those who support HDIP if we can build some equity into the program. But as I said in my floor speech, when my constituents are begging the state legislature to pass a local option for rent stabilization, when we've been working for years to pass a local option real estate transfer fee to tax high-end transactions and fund local affordable housing efforts — I could not in good conscience vote for HDIP.

    This is important, so I invite you to watch my five-minute speech on this topic from the House floor. I posted it to my YouTube.

    Right now, my opponent is going door-to-door, telling voters I have opposed housing. But that is a ridiculous claim. At our forum, I had to remind him that leading pro-housing groups like Abundant Housing MA and Somerville YIMBY have endorsed my campaign.

    Mr. Miller keep telling voters that I “voted against funding for gateway cities to add new homes to their downtown” and “voted against funding for housing in working-class cities.” I hope my explanation helps put this vote in context. I believe the residents of our community want a State Representative who will look at how state dollars are spent through an equity lens, and work to ensure that state programs are designed to have the greatest public benefit.

    Mr. Miller is also criticizing my support for the deal that brought TransMedics to Assembly Row. TransMedics makes devices that transport lungs, hearts, and livers for transplantation, saving lives. That deal bringing this company to the 26th Middlesex includes $18 million in state tax breaks and $18 million in city tax breaks. What makes this combined deal good is that it comes with real requirements for 900 jobs and millions of dollars in investment in Somerville. Progress is assessed annually, and if the company fails to deliver, both the state and the city can claw back those incentives. That’s the key difference between the TransMedics deal and the HDIP program: this public investment comes with enforceable requirements, clawbacks, and accountability, while HDIP has no affordability requirement whatsoever. Moreover, the TransMedics deal was approved on a 10-0 vote by the Somerville City Council in October 2025.

    I could spend all day writing to you about some of the other dishonest claims that have been made in this race, or why I have every major organizational endorsement in my campaign. But I should probably get out there and keep knocking doors myself. 

    If you value the kind of leadership I bring to the State House, on housing and on so many other issues, I respectfully ask for your support in whatever ways are possible right now and over the next two weeks.

    Thank you, once again, for being an informed constituent. 

    Yours in service,

    Mike